This Blog Has Been Glanced at This Many Times:

Saturday, December 1, 2007

Peter Jackson? Hobbit? 3D?

Put this in your rumor wallet, but as of right now word is going around that Peter Jackson will be directing, not one, but two "Hobbit" films set to be released post-2010 and in 3D as well.

Now I understand the 3D craze is beginning and with the growth of digital projection systems more and more 3D movies are likely. "Beowulf" has only scratched the surface. We also know that Jackson is very much in love with the 3D concept and plans to do a trilogy with Spielberg in 3D. ("Tintin")

However, why is it necessary to bring the Hobbit to us in 3D? Furthermore, why is it necessary to split it up in to two movies? And post-2010? This sounds pretty bogus to me.Add to that Jackson is still in a legal battle with New Line, Sam Raimi was being considered to direct "The Hobbit" and the original release date New Line was committed to was 2009.

I know I don't normally pass along rumors on my blog, but this was pretty interesting. Now to await official word from New Lin and/or Jackson himself.

"The Dark Knight" Video Interview and On Stage Footage

The Today Show had an exclusive interview with Christian Bale, Aaron Eckhart and Director Christopher Nolan about the upcoming Batman sequel, "Batman Begins." Some shots are onstage footage of Bale in the new Batsuit. He certianly still has that badass voice too! Very nice interview take a look:



Let me know if the video goes down, I'll find another link.

Two More Hellboy Posters

I wanted to wait for the one with hellboy actually revealed on it as to not make too big of a deal out of these crappy posters. They really need to find a better way to advertise characters from genre movies. Certianly there's a mroe creative way of doing it besides plastering their face on a poster. Anyway, here's Abe Sapien and Hellboy. del Toro's sequel, "Hellboy II: The Golden Army," arrives in theaters next summer. Click to enlarge:

Friday, November 30, 2007

Joker Loves the Magazines

Empire Magazine aren't the only magazine that delivered a new picture of Batman's arch nemesis. Another picture of the Joker has been revealed. Damn he looks hideous... Click to enlarge:

Thursday, November 29, 2007

"Zohen" is Not To Be Messed With

Adam Sandler will be starring in another of-the-wall comedy titled "You Don't Mess With Zohen." The project is directed by "Happy Gilmore" director Dennis Dugan. While this combination sounds promising, Dugan hasn't done so well since then. Remember "Chuck & Larry," "National Security" and "Benchwarmers?" Confident about this movie now?
To add to that, the writers of "Knocked Up" and SNL are the ones responsible for this story about an Israel Agent who moves to New York to satisfy his dream of becoming a hair stylist. Wow. Sounds groundbreaking.
It's a shame because Sandler has come up with some pretty good stuff in the recent years and I hate to see him dip this low....again.
The director of "Benchwarmers" and the writer of "Knocked Up?" I will pass!
The picture above is a still from the movie. Click it to enlarge.... If you want to that is...

Hellboy 2 Teaser Poster 1

I'm looking forward to this movie for a few reasons. I liked the first one, I liked the characters and I love the director. Guillermo del Toro's "Hellboy II: The Golden Army" marches to theaters next year. That said, I hate the teaser poster. But I'm forced not to complain too much because it's Selma Blair as Liz Sherman. 'Nuff said. Click to enlarge:



I still hate promotions like this.

New "Friday the 13th" NOT a Remake or "Re-imagining"

More information has come up about the new Jason flick. This movie will not be a remake or a new origin story of any sort, but rather a side-story that takes place in between some of the early Jason movies.
An insider from Mania had this information to pass along:

"It's not a remake. Don't even expect an origin tale - as some production listings around Hollywood are pegging it as. Imagine if there was a story to be told somewhere between parts two and four, just add water (from Camp Crystal Lake, duh), insert a leaner, meaner, faster Jason Voorhees, set to "blend" and you've got the recipe for what Dunes, writers Damian Shannon and Mark Swift and director Marcus Nispel got cookin."

Faster? We already know he's mean and lean. The Jason movies have always been crap, but they have their cult flick charm. I'm not a big fan of them and I can't say I like Marcus Nispel, so I probably won't pay this movie much attention. With this new information, it just sounds like yet another bargain bin Jason flick.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Indiana Jones In Full Wardrobe

Some great, new pictures of Ford in his Indy gear has appeared online and I must say, he looks superb. Ford looks very comfortable wearing that jacket and hat again, and the pictures make him look as perfect for the part as the first three films did. Click to enlarge:




Next summer. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull!

New Joker Pic Revealed By Empire



Empire Magazine has released its cover with a rather grotesque Joker played by Heath Ledger in "The Dark Knight." Click it to enlarge.
Gotta applaud how demented he looks. I don't think this will be your daddy's Joker.

Monday, November 19, 2007

REVIEW - "Beowulf" (2007)


The definition of a true hero seems to have changed drastically over the course of history. There seem to be very few purely good, flawless heroes in today’s stories. If such were the case perhaps we would have received a truer version of the Beowulf poem from director Robert Zemeckis, but as it stands, “Beowulf” is just as much of an imperfect adaptation as it is an imperfect movie.

The film begins with Hrothgar’s Hall being crushed by the creature known as Grendel—Once it’s nearly destroyed it closes under King Hrothgar’s orders. “No more merry-making!” He announces. Then enters Beowulf, the great hero of old English literature. He comes to Hrothgar’s kingdom to claim the glory of defeating Grendel and after that any resemblance to the original poem ends. Sure there is a battle with a dragon at the end, and Beowulf does become a powerful king, but the reasons and meanings behind those events are completely lost in the upheaval of CG animation and needless story changes.

I will not list the differences between the Beowulf poem and the film because a review should not be a list. However, I will say that I very much enjoy the original story and its concept of merging pagan and Christian elements as one. (While Beowulf praised God in the poem, he scolds Christ for “killing the age of heroes” in the film.) The real question to these changes is “why?” Well it’s very simple. Look at all the superhero movies we get these days. Batman, Spider-Man, Hulk, the X-Men—They all have some element of tragedy and flaws within them and they are all very successful. The fact is people find flawed heroes far more interesting, and the goody-goodies are now left for young children to worship: Goku from “Dragon Ball Z,” the Power Rangers…etc…

Beowulf’s character in the film is almost a complete 180 compared to the poem’s hero. As such he’s probably a character today’s culture can accept easier. Is that good for the movie and the box office? Probably, but it isn’t the Beowulf I wanted to see—It certainly wasn’t the real Beowulf anyway. The butchering of the poem may have helped grab a wider audience, but it really says something about our culture’s attention span, and willingness to step outside of the box, if all we want to accept is the same old stuff we’ve seen hundreds of times before. The opportunity to bring back the flawless hero is dropped altogether and as a result the major themes and original story of the Beowulf epic is lost.

This isn’t to say the film is altogether bad. If one pretends to ignore the existence of the original poem they may find a decent movie underneath the CG character illustrations and poor writing. Frankly I didn’t see too much more than some impressive visuals and entertaining action sequences, but I certainly appreciate the underlying art to all of it.

“Beowulf” looks pretty. While I don’t necessarily understand why the choice was made to CG animate the entire film as realistically as possible, I assume that’s the only reason it was made to begin with. From what I can gather, Zemeckis wanted to further CG filmmaking and he needed some sort of streamlined action story to do that. He dumbs down a legendary poem, makes it fitting for today’s audience and then spends the rest of the time evolving CG effects and 3-D technology. In that aspect he succeeded. I have to admit that, even though I thought some shots looked peculiar, the effects were very good. CG animation has come a long way since “Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.”

Now I don’t want to completely bash “Beowulf.” It has its merits and is certainly entertaining, but I feel Zemeckis has lost touch with reality. If this type of generic storytelling is what we’re going to get every time a CG movie of this caliber is made, then I have no interest in more films like this. What a nightmare “Back to the Future” might have been had he made it today. At least it would look nice. Right?

** out of ****